Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Suriname: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Suriname
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 10.6% against 10.4% in Suriname, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 42nd and Suriname ranks 43rd of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iran, Islamic Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.0% | 14.3% | 3.3% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 12.7% | 10.2% | 2.5% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2020s | 10.6% | 10.2% | 0.5% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Suriname?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 10.6% against 10.4% in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Suriname?
- 0.2%, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Suriname rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 42nd and Suriname ranks 43rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).