Palau vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Palau
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 22.4% against 20.3% in Palau, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Palau's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Palau ranks 8th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Palau averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Palau | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7% | 8.2% | 7.4% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 67.4% | 11.9% | 55.5% | Palau |
| 2020s | 20.4% | 21.7% | 1.3% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Palau or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 22.4% against 20.3% in Palau as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Palau and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 2.1%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do Palau and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Palau ranks 8th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).