Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tunisia: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 9.1% against 8.9% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tunisia ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 54th and Tunisia ranks 51st of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.6% | 18.8% | 6.2% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 10.8% | 9.3% | 1.5% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 9.1% against 8.9% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2016.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tunisia?
- 0.2%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tunisia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tunisia rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 54th and Tunisia ranks 51st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).