Armenia vs Papua New Guinea: Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Armenia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 7.8% against 7.6% in Armenia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Armenia ranks 98th and Papua New Guinea ranks 95th of 184 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5% | 4.0% | 0.5% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 5.6% | 9.4% | 3.9% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 6.2% | 7.8% | 1.7% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, primary products, Armenia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 7.8% against 7.6% in Armenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, primary products between Armenia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.2%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Papua New Guinea?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, primary products?
- Armenia ranks 98th and Papua New Guinea ranks 95th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean most favored nations tariff is the average of most favored nation rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).