Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Transport services
Transport services over time
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 43.8% against 22.3% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 21.5%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 2.0 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 17th and Lithuania ranks 15th of 45 groups.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 29.4% | 50.4% | 21.0% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 19.1% | 47.4% | 28.3% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 22.4% | 58.5% | 36.1% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 25.4% | 53.7% | 28.3% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher transport services, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 43.8% against 22.3% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in transport services between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
- 21.5%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania rank globally for transport services?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 17th and Lithuania ranks 15th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Transport services (% of commercial service exports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Transport is the process of carriage of people and objects from one location to another as well as related supporting and auxiliary services. Also included are postal and courier services. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service exports which are commercial services provided by residents to non-residents.