Dealing with construction … Score 0-15 Building control in Lithuania
Lithuania: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index was 86.67 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index in Lithuania, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index in Lithuania is 86.67, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is up 18.2% over ten years.
Lithuania ranks 23rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 73.33 | — |
| 2015 | 73.33 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 73.33 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 86.67 | +18.2% |
| 2018 | 86.67 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 86.67 | +0.0% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 86.67 is above the median for high income countries, which is 80, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 86.67 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 80, 1.1× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Lithuania
- 21 Indonesia 91.87 compare
- 22 Iran 90 compare
- 23 Japan 86.67 compare
- 23 Albania 86.67 compare
- 23 Austria 86.67 compare
- 23 Belarus 86.67 compare
- 23 Bosnia and Herzegovina 86.67 compare
- 23 Cameroon 86.67 compare
- 23 Chile 86.67 compare
- 23 Dominican Republic 86.67 compare
- 23 France 86.67 compare
- 23 Hungary 86.67 compare
- 23 Ireland 86.67 compare
- 23 Kazakhstan 86.67 compare
- 23 Malaysia 86.67 compare
- 23 Morocco 86.67 compare
- 23 North Macedonia 86.67 compare
- 23 Peru 86.67 compare
- 23 Philippines 86.67 compare
- 23 Qatar 86.67 compare
- 23 Romania 86.67 compare
- 23 San Marino 86.67 compare
- 23 Singapore 86.67 compare
- 23 Slovenia 86.67 compare
- 23 Taiwan 86.67 compare
- 23 Turkey 86.67 compare
More private sector data for Lithuania
- Merchandise trade 95.2% (2025)
- Food imports 13.1% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 63.0% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 49.01 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 19.7% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 60.0% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 41.63 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 14,410 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.4372 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 4.55 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: building quality control index in Lithuania?
- Dealing with construction permits: building quality control index in Lithuania was 86.67 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: building quality control index recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 86.67 in 2017.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: building quality control index recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 73.33 in 2014.
- How does Lithuania rank for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index?
- Lithuania ranks 23rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: building quality control index rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 18.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the building quality control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.