Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score in Cambodia
Cambodia: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score was 84.9% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score in Cambodia, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Cambodia recorded 84.9% for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in 2019.
That represents a change of up 1.5% on the previous year and down 11.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in Cambodia peaked at 96.5% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 63.5%, in 2012.
Cambodia ranks 101st of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score in Cambodia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 91.9% | — |
| 2006 | 93.4% | +1.6% |
| 2007 | 94.6% | +1.4% |
| 2008 | 95.4% | +0.8% |
| 2009 | 96.1% | +0.8% |
| 2010 | 96.1% | -0.0% |
| 2011 | 96.5% | +0.5% |
| 2012 | 63.5% | -34.3% |
| 2013 | 64.7% | +2.0% |
| 2014 | 66.6% | +2.9% |
| 2015 | 69.7% | +4.7% |
| 2016 | 71.8% | +3.0% |
| 2017 | 74.1% | +3.2% |
| 2018 | 83.6% | +12.8% |
| 2019 | 84.9% | +1.5% |
Cambodia compared with similar countries
- Cambodia's 84.9% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 76.8%, 1.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Cambodia's 84.9% is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 89.2%, 95% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score in Cambodia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | -34.3% | 96.5% | 63.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.3% | 91.9% | 96.1% | 5 |
| 2010s | 77.2% | 63.5% | 96.5% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Cambodia
More private sector data for Cambodia
- Merchandise trade 127.1% (2025)
- Food imports 7.4% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 72.5% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 33.88 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 3.19 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 15.4% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 78.0% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 31.27 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 5.16 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,752 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in Cambodia?
- Dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in Cambodia was 84.9% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score recorded in Cambodia?
- The highest recorded value was 96.5% in 2011.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score recorded in Cambodia?
- The lowest recorded value was 63.5% in 2012.
- How does Cambodia rank for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Cambodia ranks 101st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score rising or falling in Cambodia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 11.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cambodia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.