Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score in Sudan
Sudan: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score was 86.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score in Sudan, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in Sudan is 86.8%, measured in 2019.
That represents a change of up 1.7% on the previous year and up 104.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in Sudan peaked at 88.3% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 16.5%, in 2005.
That places Sudan 96th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score in Sudan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 16.5% | — |
| 2006 | 29.1% | +76.6% |
| 2007 | 17.3% | -40.6% |
| 2008 | 33.1% | +91.6% |
| 2009 | 42.5% | +28.3% |
| 2010 | 46.3% | +9.1% |
| 2011 | 54.2% | +16.9% |
| 2012 | 72.2% | +33.3% |
| 2013 | 71.3% | -1.2% |
| 2014 | 73.4% | +3.0% |
| 2015 | 85.1% | +15.8% |
| 2016 | 87.0% | +2.3% |
| 2017 | 88.3% | +1.5% |
| 2018 | 85.4% | -3.4% |
| 2019 | 86.8% | +1.7% |
Sudan compared with similar countries
- Sudan's 86.8% is above the median for low income countries, which is 18.5%, 4.7× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Sudan's 86.8% is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 63.1%, 1.4× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score in Sudan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | +91.6% | 17.3% | 33.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.7% | 16.5% | 42.5% | 5 |
| 2010s | 75.0% | 46.3% | 88.3% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Sudan
More private sector data for Sudan
- Merchandise trade 15.0% (2025)
- Food imports 29.9% (2018)
- Manufactures imports 56.0% (2018)
- Merchandise imports 6.20 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 920.08 million current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 50.6% (2018)
- Manufactures exports 1.1% (2018)
- Merchandise exports 2.80 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 269.09 million current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 54.2 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in Sudan?
- Dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in Sudan was 86.8% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score recorded in Sudan?
- The highest recorded value was 88.3% in 2017.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score recorded in Sudan?
- The lowest recorded value was 16.5% in 2005.
- How does Sudan rank for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Sudan ranks 96th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score rising or falling in Sudan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 104.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Sudan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.