Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score (Score) in Chad
Chad: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score was 64 in 2019. ▼ Falling
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Chad, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Chad recorded 64 for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Chad peaked at 68 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 64, in 2012.
Chad ranks 70th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Chad, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 68 | — |
| 2006 | 68 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 68 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 68 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 68 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 68 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 68 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 64 | -5.9% |
| 2013 | 64 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 64 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 64 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 64 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 64 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 64 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 64 | +0.0% |
Chad compared with similar countries
- Chad's 64 is above the median for low income countries, which is 58, 1.1× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Chad's 64 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 60, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68 | 68 | 68 | 5 |
| 2010s | 64.8 | 64 | 68 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Chad
- 69 Russia 67.6 compare
- 70 Benin 64 compare
- 70 Eswatini 64 compare
- 70 Haiti 64 compare
- 70 Italy 64 compare
- 70 Latvia 64 compare
- 70 Mali 64 compare
- 70 Mauritania 64 compare
- 70 Micronesia (country) 64 compare
- 70 Paraguay 64 compare
- 70 Portugal 64 compare
- 70 Saudi Arabia 64 compare
- 70 Senegal 64 compare
- 70 Slovakia 64 compare
- 70 Solomon Islands 64 compare
- 70 Saint Lucia 64 compare
- 70 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 64 compare
- 70 Thailand 64 compare
- 70 Tonga 64 compare
- 70 Tunisia 64 compare
More private sector data for Chad
- Merchandise trade 28.9% (2025)
- Food imports 24.3% (1995)
- Manufactures imports 56.5% (1995)
- Merchandise imports 2.20 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 16.2% (1975)
- Manufactures exports 7.7% (1975)
- Merchandise exports 4.00 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 190.44 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1863 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate -11.11 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Chad?
- Dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Chad was 64 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Chad?
- The highest recorded value was 68 in 2005.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Chad?
- The lowest recorded value was 64 in 2012.
- How does Chad rank for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Chad ranks 70th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Chad?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Chad data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.