Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea

Equatorial Guinea: Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score was 40 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
40
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
133rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
40
in 2014
All-time low
30
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea, 2013–2019

0102030402013201620192013: 302014: 402015: 402016: 402017: 402018: 402019: 40

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score in Equatorial Guinea stood at 40. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

That represents a change of up 33.3% over ten years.

That places Equatorial Guinea 133rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea, year by year

Annual values for Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 30 —
2014 40 +33.3%
2015 40 +0.0%
2016 40 +0.0%
2017 40 +0.0%
2018 40 +0.0%
2019 40 +0.0%

Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries

  • Equatorial Guinea's 40 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 60, 67% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Equatorial Guinea's 40 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 40, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea

  1. 133 Comoros 40 compare
  2. 133 Congo 40 compare
  3. 133 Djibouti 40 compare
  4. 133 Gabon 40 compare
  5. 133 Lebanon 40 compare
  6. 133 Madagascar 40 compare
  7. 133 Mauritania 40 compare
  8. 133 Paraguay 40 compare
  9. 133 Philippines 40 compare
  10. 133 Sri Lanka 40 compare
  11. 133 Venezuela 40 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Equatorial Guinea

All data for Equatorial Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score in Equatorial Guinea?
Getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score in Equatorial Guinea was 40 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 40 in 2014.
What is the lowest getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 30 in 2013.
How does Equatorial Guinea rank for getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 133rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
Over the last ten years it is up 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-credit-db15-20-methodology-score/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-credit-db15-20-methodology-score/equatorial-guinea/">Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,335 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.