Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Sao Tome and Principe

Sao Tome and Principe: Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score was 25 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
25
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
166th
of 191 countries
All-time high
25
in 2013
All-time low
25
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Sao Tome and Principe, 2013–2019

05101520252013201620192013: 252014: 252015: 252016: 252017: 252018: 252019: 25

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score in Sao Tome and Principe stood at 25. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Sao Tome and Principe 166th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Sao Tome and Principe, year by year

Annual values for Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Sao Tome and Principe, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 25 —
2014 25 +0.0%
2015 25 +0.0%
2016 25 +0.0%
2017 25 +0.0%
2018 25 +0.0%
2019 25 +0.0%

Sao Tome and Principe compared with similar countries

  • Sao Tome and Principe's 25 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 55, 45% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Sao Tome and Principe's 25 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 40, 62% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Sao Tome and Principe

  1. 166 Antigua and Barbuda 25 compare
  2. 166 Fiji 25 compare
  3. 166 Mozambique 25 compare
  4. 166 Sierra Leone 25 compare
  5. 166 Saint Kitts and Nevis 25 compare
  6. 166 Saint Lucia 25 compare
  7. 166 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 25 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Sao Tome and Principe

All data for Sao Tome and Principe →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score in Sao Tome and Principe?
Getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score in Sao Tome and Principe was 25 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
The highest recorded value was 25 in 2013.
What is the lowest getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
The lowest recorded value was 25 in 2013.
How does Sao Tome and Principe rank for getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 166th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Sao Tome and Principe?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Sao Tome and Principe data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Sao Tome and Principe. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-credit-db15-20-methodology-score/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-credit-db15-20-methodology-score/sao-tome-and-principe/">Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Sao Tome and Principe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,335 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.