Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Trinidad and Tobago

Trinidad and Tobago: Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score was 65 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
65
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
68th
of 191 countries
All-time high
65
in 2014
All-time low
60
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Trinidad and Tobago, 2013–2019

02040602013201620192013: 602014: 652015: 652016: 652017: 652018: 652019: 65

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Trinidad and Tobago recorded 65 for getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 8.3% over ten years.

Trinidad and Tobago ranks 68th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year

Annual values for Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Trinidad and Tobago, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 60 —
2014 65 +8.3%
2015 65 +0.0%
2016 65 +0.0%
2017 65 +0.0%
2018 65 +0.0%
2019 65 +0.0%

Trinidad and Tobago compared with similar countries

  • Trinidad and Tobago's 65 is above the median for high income countries, which is 60, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Trinidad and Tobago's 65 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 50, 1.3× the median. (33 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago

  1. 68 Belgium 65 compare
  2. 68 Bosnia and Herzegovina 65 compare
  3. 68 Bulgaria 65 compare
  4. 68 Egypt 65 compare
  5. 68 South Korea 65 compare
  6. 68 Mauritius 65 compare
  7. 68 Senegal 65 compare
  8. 68 Serbia 65 compare
  9. 68 Switzerland 65 compare
  10. 68 Tanzania 65 compare
  11. 68 Uzbekistan 65 compare
  12. 68 Zimbabwe 65 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Trinidad and Tobago

All data for Trinidad and Tobago →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score in Trinidad and Tobago?
Getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score in Trinidad and Tobago was 65 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
The highest recorded value was 65 in 2014.
What is the lowest getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
The lowest recorded value was 60 in 2013.
How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 68th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is getting credit (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
Over the last ten years it is up 8.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Trinidad and Tobago. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-credit-db15-20-methodology-score/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-credit-db15-20-methodology-score/trinidad-and-tobago/">Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Trinidad and Tobago</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,335 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.