Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Mauritius
Mauritius: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) was 100 in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Mauritius, 2004–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Mauritius recorded 100 for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in 2013. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 20.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over five years.
Over the whole period, getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Mauritius peaked at 100 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2004.
Mauritius ranks 1st of 184 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 0 | — |
| 2005 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | 33.33 | — |
| 2007 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 50 | +50.0% |
| 2009 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 83.33 | +66.7% |
| 2013 | 100 | +20.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.78 | 0 | 50 | 6 |
| 2010s | 70.83 | 50 | 100 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mauritius
- 1 United States 100 compare
- 1 Mexico 100 compare
- 1 Argentina 100 compare
- 1 Armenia 100 compare
- 1 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 100 compare
- 1 Canada 100 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 100 compare
- 1 Dominican Republic 100 compare
- 1 Ecuador 100 compare
- 1 Egypt 100 compare
- 1 El Salvador 100 compare
- 1 Georgia 100 compare
- 1 Germany 100 compare
- 1 Guatemala 100 compare
- 1 Honduras 100 compare
- 1 Republic of Korea 100 compare
- 1 Lithuania 100 compare
- 1 Malaysia 100 compare
- 1 Nicaragua 100 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 100 compare
- 1 Panama 100 compare
- 1 Paraguay 100 compare
- 1 Peru 100 compare
- 1 Poland 100 compare
- 1 Rwanda 100 compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 100 compare
- 1 South Africa 100 compare
- 1 Switzerland 100 compare
- 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100 compare
More private sector data for Mauritius
- Merchandise trade 57.4% (2025)
- Food imports 21.2% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 54.2% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 6.94 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 50.9% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 46.1% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 2.34 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,883 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1449 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate -1.1 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Mauritius?
- Getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Mauritius was 100 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 100 in 2013.
- What is the lowest getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2004.
- How does Mauritius rank for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Mauritius ranks 1st out of 184 countries with data for 2013.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.