Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-8) (DB15-20) in Jordan
Jordan: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-8) (DB15-20) was 100 in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-8) (DB15-20) in Jordan, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Jordan recorded 100 for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-8) (db15-20) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
The figure is up 14.3% on the previous year.
Jordan ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-8) (DB15-20) in Jordan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 0 | — |
| 2014 | 0 | — |
| 2015 | 0 | — |
| 2016 | 0 | — |
| 2017 | 75 | — |
| 2018 | 87.5 | +16.7% |
| 2019 | 100 | +14.3% |
Countries ranked near Jordan
- 1 China 100 compare
- 1 Indonesia 100 compare
- 1 Nigeria 100 compare
- 1 United States of America 100 compare
- 1 Mexico 100 compare
- 1 Brazil 100 compare
- 1 Argentina 100 compare
- 1 Armenia 100 compare
- 1 Australia 100 compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 100 compare
- 1 Bahrain 100 compare
- 1 Brunei Darussalam 100 compare
- 1 Canada 100 compare
- 1 Côte d'Ivoire 100 compare
- 1 Dominican Republic 100 compare
- 1 Ecuador 100 compare
- 1 Egypt 100 compare
- 1 Georgia 100 compare
- 1 Germany 100 compare
- 1 Guatemala 100 compare
- 1 Guyana 100 compare
- 1 Honduras 100 compare
- 1 Iran, Islamic Republic of 100 compare
- 1 Israel 100 compare
- 1 Jamaica 100 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 100 compare
- 1 Kenya 100 compare
- 1 Republic of Korea 100 compare
- 1 Kuwait 100 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 100 compare
- 1 Latvia 100 compare
- 1 Lithuania 100 compare
- 1 Malaysia 100 compare
- 1 New Zealand 100 compare
- 1 Nicaragua 100 compare
- 1 Niger 100 compare
- 1 Panama 100 compare
- 1 Peru 100 compare
- 1 Poland 100 compare
- 1 Qatar 100 compare
- 1 Rwanda 100 compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 100 compare
- 1 Taiwan 100 compare
- 1 Tanzania, United Republic of 100 compare
- 1 Togo 100 compare
- 1 Türkiye 100 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100 compare
- 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100 compare
- 1 Uruguay 100 compare
- 1 Viet Nam 100 compare
- 1 Palestine, State of 100 compare
- 1 Zambia 100 compare
More private sector data for Jordan
- Merchandise trade 71.2% (2025)
- Food imports 20.7% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 56.9% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 28.95 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 17.6% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 72.1% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 14.91 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,294 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2421 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 10.19 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-8) (db15-20) in Jordan?
- Getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-8) (db15-20) in Jordan was 100 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-8) (db15-20) recorded in Jordan?
- The highest recorded value was 100 in 2019.
- What is the lowest getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-8) (db15-20) recorded in Jordan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2013.
- How does Jordan rank for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-8) (db15-20)?
- Jordan ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Jordan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-8) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.