Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20) in Australia

Australia: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20) was 91.67 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
91.67
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
6th
of 191 countries
All-time high
91.67
in 2013
All-time low
91.67
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20) in Australia, 2013–2019

0204060801002013201620192013: 91.72014: 91.72015: 91.72016: 91.72017: 91.72018: 91.72019: 91.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) (db15-20) in Australia stood at 91.67. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Australia 6th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20) in Australia, year by year

Annual values for Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Australia, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 91.67
2014 91.67 +0.0%
2015 91.67 +0.0%
2016 91.67 +0.0%
2017 91.67 +0.0%
2018 91.67 +0.0%
2019 91.67 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Australia

  1. 6 United States of America 91.67 compare
  2. 6 Colombia 91.67 compare
  3. 6 Jordan 91.67 compare
  4. 6 Kenya 91.67 compare
  5. 6 Kosovo 91.67 compare
  6. 6 Malawi 91.67 compare
  7. 6 Rwanda 91.67 compare
  8. 6 Tajikistan 91.67 compare
  9. 6 Vanuatu 91.67 compare
  10. 6 Zambia 91.67 compare
  11. 6 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 91.67 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Australia

All data for Australia →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) (db15-20) in Australia?
Getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) (db15-20) in Australia was 91.67 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) (db15-20) recorded in Australia?
The highest recorded value was 91.67 in 2013.
What is the lowest getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) (db15-20) recorded in Australia?
The lowest recorded value was 91.67 in 2013.
How does Australia rank for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) (db15-20)?
Australia ranks 6th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) (db15-20) rising or falling in Australia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Australia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20) in Australia. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-credit-strength-of-legal-rights-index-0-12-db15-20-methodology-score/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-credit-strength-of-legal-rights-index-0-12-db15-20-methodology-score/australia/">Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20) in Australia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,335 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.