Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) in Malta
Malta: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) in Malta, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
Malta recorded 2 DB15-20 methodology for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
That places Malta 147th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) in Malta, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2014 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Malta
- 147 Pakistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Brazil 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Algeria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Argentina 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Burundi 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Greece 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Haiti 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Italy 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Lebanon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Madagascar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Maldives 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Mauritania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Morocco 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Myanmar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Netherlands 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Nicaragua 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Portugal 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Seychelles 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 South Sudan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Sri Lanka 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Suriname 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 147 Taiwan, China 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Malta
- Merchandise trade 46.9% (2025)
- Food imports 11.9% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 65.2% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 9.22 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 9.7% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 76.4% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 3.82 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 6,588 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1375 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 0.9783 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) in Malta?
- Getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) in Malta was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) recorded in Malta?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- What is the lowest getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) recorded in Malta?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- How does Malta rank for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12)?
- Malta ranks 147th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) rising or falling in Malta?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Malta data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 12 based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.