Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Africa

South Africa: Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 68.79 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
68.79
Change on year
down 0.0%
World rank
115th
of 191 countries
All-time high
68.79
in 2018
All-time low
41.81
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Africa, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 41.82015: 63.22016: 56.22017: 56.32018: 68.82019: 68.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score in South Africa is 68.79, measured in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 64.5% over ten years.

That places South Africa 115th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Africa, year by year

Annual values for Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Africa, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 41.81 —
2015 63.16 +51.1%
2016 56.23 -11.0%
2017 56.27 +0.1%
2018 68.79 +22.3%
2019 68.79 -0.0%

South Africa compared with similar countries

  • South Africa's 68.79 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 73.3, 94% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • South Africa's 68.79 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 52.76, 1.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near South Africa

  1. 112 Argentina 70.03 compare
  2. 113 Solomon Islands 69.56 compare
  3. 114 Iran 69.41 compare
  4. 116 Nicaragua 68.26 compare
  5. 117 Dominican Republic 67.99 compare
  6. 118 Barbados 66.2 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for South Africa

All data for South Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score in South Africa?
Getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score in South Africa was 68.79 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in South Africa?
The highest recorded value was 68.79 in 2018.
What is the lowest getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in South Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 41.81 in 2014.
How does South Africa rank for getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score?
South Africa ranks 115th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in South Africa?
Over the last ten years it is up 64.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this South Africa data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Africa. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-db16-20-methodology-score/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-db16-20-methodology-score/south-africa/">Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.