Statizoid

Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) in Equatorial Guinea

Equatorial Guinea: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2019)
0 DB16-20 methodology
World rank
135th
of 186 countries
All-time high
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
All-time low
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) in Equatorial Guinea, 2014–2019

00.20.40.60.812014201620192014: 0 DB16-20 methodology2015: 0 DB16-20 methodology2016: 0 DB16-20 methodology2017: 0 DB16-20 methodology2018: 0 DB16-20 methodology2019: 0 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) in Equatorial Guinea is 0 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea

  1. 135 Bangladesh 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 135 Nigeria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 135 Afghanistan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 135 Angola 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 135 Benin 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 135 Bhutan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 135 Botswana 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 135 Cape Verde 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 135 Cameroon 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 135 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 135 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 135 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 135 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 135 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 135 Ethiopia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 135 Gambia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 135 Georgia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 135 Grenada 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 135 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 135 Guinea-Bissau 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  21. 135 Guyana 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  22. 135 Haiti 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  23. 135 Honduras 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  24. 135 Kiribati 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  25. 135 Kyrgyzstan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  26. 135 Lebanon 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  27. 135 Lesotho 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  28. 135 Liberia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  29. 135 Madagascar 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  30. 135 Maldives 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  31. 135 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  32. 135 Marshall Islands 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  33. 135 Mauritania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  34. 135 Micronesia, Federated States of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  35. 135 Mongolia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  36. 135 Mozambique 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  37. 135 Myanmar 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  38. 135 Nepal 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  39. 135 Niger 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  40. 135 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  41. 135 Seychelles 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  42. 135 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  43. 135 Solomon Islands 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  44. 135 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  45. 135 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  46. 135 Syrian Arab Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  47. 135 Tajikistan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  48. 135 Timor-Leste 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  49. 135 Togo 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  50. 135 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  51. 135 Zimbabwe 0 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 186 places β†’

More private sector data for Equatorial Guinea

All data for Equatorial Guinea β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) in Equatorial Guinea?
Getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) in Equatorial Guinea was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
What is the lowest getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
How does Equatorial Guinea rank for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) in Equatorial Guinea. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-mechanisms-for-restoring-service-0-1-db16-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-mechanisms-for-restoring-service-0-1-db16-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/">Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) in Equatorial Guinea</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,116 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.