Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Eswatini
Eswatini: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score was 50 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Eswatini, 2009–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Eswatini stood at 50. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Eswatini peaked at 50 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 50, in 2009.
That places Eswatini 135th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 50 | — |
| 2010 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 50 | +0.0% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's 50 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 66.67, 75% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's 50 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 66.67, 75% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 50 | 50 | 1 |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 50 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 135 Pakistan 50 compare
- 135 Afghanistan 50 compare
- 135 Albania 50 compare
- 135 Argentina 50 compare
- 135 Belgium 50 compare
- 135 Bulgaria 50 compare
- 135 Cape Verde 50 compare
- 135 Chad 50 compare
- 135 Democratic Republic of Congo 50 compare
- 135 Congo 50 compare
- 135 El Salvador 50 compare
- 135 Iran 50 compare
- 135 Kazakhstan 50 compare
- 135 Kiribati 50 compare
- 135 Madagascar 50 compare
- 135 Malawi 50 compare
- 135 Maldives 50 compare
- 135 Moldova 50 compare
- 135 Myanmar 50 compare
- 135 Namibia 50 compare
- 135 Nicaragua 50 compare
- 135 Peru 50 compare
- 135 Senegal 50 compare
- 135 Saint Lucia 50 compare
- 135 Uganda 50 compare
- 135 Venezuela 50 compare
- 135 Zimbabwe 50 compare
More private sector data for Eswatini
- Merchandise trade 86.4% (2025)
- Food imports 19.6% (2023)
- Manufactures imports 58.1% (2023)
- Merchandise imports 2.09 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 29.7% (2023)
- Manufactures exports 59.8% (2023)
- Merchandise exports 2.37 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,887 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.4592 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 1.85 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Eswatini?
- Getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Eswatini was 50 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 50 in 2009.
- What is the lowest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 50 in 2009.
- How does Eswatini rank for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Eswatini ranks 135th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.