Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Paraguay

Paraguay: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff was 37.5 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
37.5
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
125th
of 191 countries
All-time high
37.5
in 2018
All-time low
25
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Paraguay, 2014–2019

0102030402014201620192014: 252015: 252016: 252017: 252018: 37.52019: 37.5

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Paraguay stood at 37.5. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is up 50.0% over ten years.

Paraguay ranks 125th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Paraguay, year by year

Annual values for Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Paraguay, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 25
2015 25 +0.0%
2016 25 +0.0%
2017 25 +0.0%
2018 37.5 +50.0%
2019 37.5 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Paraguay

  1. 125 Cambodia 37.5 compare
  2. 125 Gabon 37.5 compare
  3. 125 Grenada 37.5 compare
  4. 125 Lao People's Democratic Republic 37.5 compare
  5. 125 Mongolia 37.5 compare
  6. 125 Puerto Rico 37.5 compare
  7. 125 Seychelles 37.5 compare
  8. 125 Togo 37.5 compare
  9. 125 Tonga 37.5 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Paraguay

All data for Paraguay →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Paraguay?
Getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Paraguay was 37.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Paraguay?
The highest recorded value was 37.5 in 2018.
What is the lowest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Paraguay?
The lowest recorded value was 25 in 2014.
How does Paraguay rank for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
Paraguay ranks 125th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff rising or falling in Paraguay?
Over the last ten years it is up 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Paraguay data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Paraguay. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-reliability-of-supply-and-transparency-of-tariff-index-0-8-db16-20-2/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-reliability-of-supply-and-transparency-of-tariff-index-0-8-db16-20-2/paraguay/">Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Paraguay</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.