Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Namibia

Namibia: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff was 6 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
6 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
60th
of 187 countries
All-time high
6 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Namibia, 2014–2019

02462014201620192014: 0 DB16-20 methodology2015: 6 DB16-20 methodology2016: 6 DB16-20 methodology2017: 6 DB16-20 methodology2018: 6 DB16-20 methodology2019: 6 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Namibia stood at 6 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That places Namibia 60th out of 187 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Namibia, year by year

Annual values for Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) in Namibia, 2014 to 2019.
Year DB16-20 methodology Change
2014 0 DB16-20 methodology
2015 6 DB16-20 methodology
2016 6 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 6 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 6 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 6 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Namibia

  1. 59 India 6.47 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 60 Indonesia 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 60 Brazil 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 60 Armenia 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 60 Bahrain 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 60 Barbados 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 60 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 60 Bosnia and Herzegovina 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 60 Bulgaria 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 60 Canada 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 60 Colombia 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 60 El Salvador 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 60 Israel 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 60 Jordan 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 60 Kosovo 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 60 Kuwait 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 60 Malta 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 60 Mauritius 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 60 Norway 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 60 Panama 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  21. 60 Peru 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  22. 60 Philippines 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  23. 60 Rwanda 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  24. 60 Saudi Arabia 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  25. 60 Serbia 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  26. 60 Sri Lanka 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  27. 60 Trinidad and Tobago 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  28. 60 Tunisia 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  29. 60 Uruguay 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  30. 60 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 6 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Namibia

All data for Namibia →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Namibia?
Getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Namibia was 6 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Namibia?
The highest recorded value was 6 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Namibia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
How does Namibia rank for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
Namibia ranks 60th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Namibia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Namibia. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-reliability-of-supply-and-transparency-of-tariff-index-0-8-db16-20/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-reliability-of-supply-and-transparency-of-tariff-index-0-8-db16-20/namibia/">Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Namibia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,122 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index is calculated on the basis of the following six components: (i) duration and frequency of power outages, (ii) tools to monitor power outages, (iii) tools to restore power supply, (iv) regulatory monitoring of utilities’ performance, (v) financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages, and (vi) transparency and accessibility of tariffs. An economy is eligible to obtain a score on the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index only if (i) the utility collects data on all types of outages (average total duration of outages per customer and the average number of outages per customer), including planned and unplanned outages, as well as load shedding, with the minimum outage time of not more than 5 minutes; and (ii) the SAIDI value is below a threshold of 100 hours and the SAIFI value is under 100 outages. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.