Global: Ease of doing business score in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Global: Ease of doing business score was 41.05 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2019)
41.05 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
up 1.3%
World rank
178th
of 190 countries
All-time high
41.05 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
All-time low
38.49 DB17-20 methodology
in 2016
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Global: Ease of doing business score in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, 2015–2019

0102030402015201720192015: 40 DB17-20 methodology2016: 38.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 40.3 DB17-20 methodology2018: 40.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 41.1 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for global: ease of doing business score in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of is 41.05 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 1.3% on the previous year and up 2.6% over five years.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 178th of 190 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea, Republic of

  1. 175 Liberia 43.23 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 176 Syrian Arab Republic 41.97 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 177 Angola 41.29 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 179 Haiti 40.72 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 180 Congo, Republic of 39.53 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 181 Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of 39.36 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More private sector data for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of

All data for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is global: ease of doing business score in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
Global: ease of doing business score in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of was 41.05 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest global: ease of doing business score recorded in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 41.05 DB17-20 methodology in 2019.
What is the lowest global: ease of doing business score recorded in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 38.49 DB17-20 methodology in 2016.
How does Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank for global: ease of doing business score?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 178th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Equatorial Guinea, Republic of data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Global: Ease of doing business score (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Global: Ease of doing business score in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/global-ease-of-doing-business-score-db17-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/global-ease-of-doing-business-score-db17-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/">Global: Ease of doing business score in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global: Ease of doing business score (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.