Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics in Pakistan

Pakistan: Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics was 2.59 1=low to 5=high in 2018. ▬ Flat

Latest (2018)
2.59 1=low to 5=high
Change on year
down 8.0%
World rank
106th
of 156 countries
All-time high
2.82 1=low to 5=high
in 2016
All-time low
2.28 1=low to 5=high
in 2010
Years of data
6
2007–2018

Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics in Pakistan, 2007–2018

01232007201220182007: 2.7 1=low to 5=high2010: 2.3 1=low to 5=high2012: 2.8 1=low to 5=high2014: 2.8 1=low to 5=high2016: 2.8 1=low to 5=high2018: 2.6 1=low to 5=high

Source: Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Measured in 1=low to 5=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics in Pakistan is 2.59 1=low to 5=high, measured in 2018.

That represents a change of down 8.0% on the previous year and down 4.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics in Pakistan peaked at 2.82 1=low to 5=high in 2016 and was at its lowest, 2.28 1=low to 5=high, in 2010.

That places Pakistan 106th out of 156 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.

Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics in Pakistan, year by year

Annual values for Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high) in Pakistan, 2007 to 2018.
Year 1=low to 5=high Change
2007 2.71 1=low to 5=high
2010 2.28 1=low to 5=high -15.9%
2012 2.77 1=low to 5=high +21.5%
2014 2.79 1=low to 5=high +0.6%
2016 2.82 1=low to 5=high +1.0%
2018 2.59 1=low to 5=high -8.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.71 1=low to 5=high 2.71 1=low to 5=high 2.71 1=low to 5=high 1
2010s 2.65 1=low to 5=high 2.28 1=low to 5=high 2.82 1=low to 5=high 5

Countries ranked near Pakistan

  1. 107 Jordan 2.55 1=low to 5=high compare
  2. 108 Bahamas 2.5 1=low to 5=high compare
  3. 108 Ghana 2.5 1=low to 5=high compare
  4. 108 Jamaica 2.5 1=low to 5=high compare
  5. 108 Mali 2.5 1=low to 5=high compare
  6. 108 Mauritania 2.5 1=low to 5=high compare
  7. 108 Mauritius 2.5 1=low to 5=high compare
  8. 108 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 2.5 1=low to 5=high compare

See the full ranking of 203 places →

More private sector data for Pakistan

All data for Pakistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics in Pakistan?
Logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics in Pakistan was 2.59 1=low to 5=high in 2018, according to Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB).
What is the highest logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics recorded in Pakistan?
The highest recorded value was 2.82 1=low to 5=high in 2016.
What is the lowest logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics recorded in Pakistan?
The lowest recorded value was 2.28 1=low to 5=high in 2010.
How does Pakistan rank for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics?
Pakistan ranks 106th out of 156 countries with data for 2018.
Is logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics rising or falling in Pakistan?
Over the last ten years it is down 4.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Pakistan data come from?
The figures come from Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as part of Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics in Pakistan. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-competence-and-quality-of-logistics-services-1-low-to-5-high/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-competence-and-quality-of-logistics-services-1-low-to-5-high/pakistan/">Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics in Pakistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.