Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced in Lithuania

Lithuania: Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced was 3.4 1=low to 5=high in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
3.4 1=low to 5=high
World rank
25th
of 156 countries
All-time high
3.49 1=low to 5=high
in 2016
All-time low
2.79 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Years of data
7
2007–2022

Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced in Lithuania, 2007–2022

01232007201420222007: 3 1=low to 5=high2010: 3.2 1=low to 5=high2012: 3 1=low to 5=high2014: 3.1 1=low to 5=high2016: 3.5 1=low to 5=high2018: 2.8 1=low to 5=high2022: 3.4 1=low to 5=high

Source: Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Measured in 1=low to 5=high.

Analysis

Lithuania recorded 3.4 1=low to 5=high for logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced in 2022.

The figure is up 14.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced in Lithuania peaked at 3.49 1=low to 5=high in 2016 and was at its lowest, 2.79 1=low to 5=high, in 2018.

That places Lithuania 25th out of 156 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.

Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced in Lithuania, year by year

Annual values for Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (1=low to 5=high) in Lithuania, 2007 to 2022.
Year 1=low to 5=high Change
2007 3 1=low to 5=high
2010 3.19 1=low to 5=high +6.3%
2012 2.97 1=low to 5=high -6.9%
2014 3.1 1=low to 5=high +4.3%
2016 3.49 1=low to 5=high +12.7%
2018 2.79 1=low to 5=high -20.1%
2022 3.4 1=low to 5=high +21.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3 1=low to 5=high 3 1=low to 5=high 3 1=low to 5=high 1
2010s 3.11 1=low to 5=high 2.79 1=low to 5=high 3.49 1=low to 5=high 5
2020s 3.4 1=low to 5=high 3.4 1=low to 5=high 3.4 1=low to 5=high 1

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 25 Czechia 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  2. 25 Estonia 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  3. 25 Hungary 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  4. 25 Italy 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  5. 25 Republic of Korea 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  6. 25 Oman 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  7. 25 Romania 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  8. 25 Slovenia 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  9. 25 Sweden 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  10. 25 Türkiye 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  11. 25 United States of America 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare

See the full ranking of 203 places →

More private sector data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced in Lithuania?
Logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced in Lithuania was 3.4 1=low to 5=high in 2022, according to Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB).
What is the highest logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 3.49 1=low to 5=high in 2016.
What is the lowest logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 2.79 1=low to 5=high in 2018.
How does Lithuania rank for logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced?
Lithuania ranks 25th out of 156 countries with data for 2022.
Is logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is up 14.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as part of Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced in Lithuania. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-ease-of-arranging-competitively-priced-shipments-1-low-to-5/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-ease-of-arranging-competitively-priced-shipments-1-low-to-5/lithuania/">Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.