Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Egypt

Egypt: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process was 2.8 1=low to 5=high in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
2.8 1=low to 5=high
World rank
58th
of 156 countries
All-time high
2.85 1=low to 5=high
in 2014
All-time low
2.08 1=low to 5=high
in 2007
Years of data
7
2007–2022

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Egypt, 2007–2022

01232007201420222007: 2.1 1=low to 5=high2010: 2.1 1=low to 5=high2012: 2.6 1=low to 5=high2014: 2.9 1=low to 5=high2016: 2.7 1=low to 5=high2018: 2.6 1=low to 5=high2022: 2.8 1=low to 5=high

Source: Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Measured in 1=low to 5=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in Egypt is 2.8 1=low to 5=high, measured in 2022.

The figure is up 7.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in Egypt peaked at 2.85 1=low to 5=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 2.08 1=low to 5=high, in 2007.

That places Egypt 58th out of 156 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Egypt, year by year

Annual values for Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high) in Egypt, 2007 to 2022.
Year 1=low to 5=high Change
2007 2.08 1=low to 5=high
2010 2.11 1=low to 5=high +1.4%
2012 2.6 1=low to 5=high +23.2%
2014 2.85 1=low to 5=high +9.7%
2016 2.75 1=low to 5=high -3.6%
2018 2.6 1=low to 5=high -5.4%
2022 2.8 1=low to 5=high +7.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.08 1=low to 5=high 2.08 1=low to 5=high 2.08 1=low to 5=high 1
2010s 2.58 1=low to 5=high 2.11 1=low to 5=high 2.85 1=low to 5=high 5
2020s 2.8 1=low to 5=high 2.8 1=low to 5=high 2.8 1=low to 5=high 1

Countries ranked near Egypt

  1. 55 Brazil 2.9 1=low to 5=high compare
  2. 55 Cyprus 2.9 1=low to 5=high compare
  3. 55 Uruguay 2.9 1=low to 5=high compare
  4. 58 Costa Rica 2.8 1=low to 5=high compare
  5. 58 Ecuador 2.8 1=low to 5=high compare
  6. 58 Honduras 2.8 1=low to 5=high compare
  7. 58 Indonesia 2.8 1=low to 5=high compare
  8. 58 Namibia 2.8 1=low to 5=high compare
  9. 58 Philippines 2.8 1=low to 5=high compare

See the full ranking of 203 places →

More private sector data for Egypt

All data for Egypt →

Frequently asked questions

What is logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in Egypt?
Logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in Egypt was 2.8 1=low to 5=high in 2022, according to Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB).
What is the highest logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process recorded in Egypt?
The highest recorded value was 2.85 1=low to 5=high in 2014.
What is the lowest logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process recorded in Egypt?
The lowest recorded value was 2.08 1=low to 5=high in 2007.
How does Egypt rank for logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process?
Egypt ranks 58th out of 156 countries with data for 2022.
Is logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process rising or falling in Egypt?
Over the last ten years it is up 7.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Egypt data come from?
The figures come from Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as part of Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Egypt. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/egypt-arab-rep/">Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Egypt</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.