Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related in Moldova

Moldova: Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related was 1.9 1=low to 5=high in 2022. ▬ Flat

Latest (2022)
1.9 1=low to 5=high
World rank
147th
of 156 countries
All-time high
2.55 1=low to 5=high
in 2014
All-time low
1.9 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Years of data
7
2007–2022

Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related in Moldova, 2007–2022

01232007201420222007: 1.9 1=low to 5=high2010: 2 1=low to 5=high2012: 2.4 1=low to 5=high2014: 2.6 1=low to 5=high2016: 2.4 1=low to 5=high2018: 2 1=low to 5=high2022: 1.9 1=low to 5=high

Source: Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Measured in 1=low to 5=high.

Analysis

In 2022, logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related in Moldova stood at 1.9 1=low to 5=high. That is the lowest value across all 7 years on record.

That represents a change of down 22.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related in Moldova peaked at 2.55 1=low to 5=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 1.9 1=low to 5=high, in 2022.

Moldova ranks 147th of 156 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high) in Moldova, 2007 to 2022.
Year 1=low to 5=high Change
2007 1.94 1=low to 5=high
2010 2.05 1=low to 5=high +5.7%
2012 2.44 1=low to 5=high +19.0%
2014 2.55 1=low to 5=high +4.7%
2016 2.35 1=low to 5=high -7.9%
2018 2.02 1=low to 5=high -14.1%
2022 1.9 1=low to 5=high -5.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1.94 1=low to 5=high 1.94 1=low to 5=high 1.94 1=low to 5=high 1
2010s 2.28 1=low to 5=high 2.02 1=low to 5=high 2.55 1=low to 5=high 5
2020s 1.9 1=low to 5=high 1.9 1=low to 5=high 1.9 1=low to 5=high 1

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 144 Myanmar 1.99 1=low to 5=high compare
  2. 145 Lesotho 1.96 1=low to 5=high compare
  3. 146 Burundi 1.95 1=low to 5=high compare
  4. 147 Nicaragua 1.9 1=low to 5=high compare
  5. 147 Somalia 1.9 1=low to 5=high compare
  6. 147 Yemen 1.9 1=low to 5=high compare

See the full ranking of 203 places →

More private sector data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related in Moldova?
Logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related in Moldova was 1.9 1=low to 5=high in 2022, according to Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB).
What is the highest logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 2.55 1=low to 5=high in 2014.
What is the lowest logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 1.9 1=low to 5=high in 2022.
How does Moldova rank for logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related?
Moldova ranks 147th out of 156 countries with data for 2022.
Is logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is down 22.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as part of Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-quality-of-trade-and-transport-related-infrastructure-1-low/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-quality-of-trade-and-transport-related-infrastructure-1-low/moldova/">Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.