Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related in Tunisia

Tunisia: Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related was 2.1 1=low to 5=high in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
2.1 1=low to 5=high
Change on year
down 14.1%
World rank
135th
of 156 countries
All-time high
2.88 1=low to 5=high
in 2012
All-time low
2.1 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Years of data
6
2007–2018

Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related in Tunisia, 2007–2018

01232007201220182007: 2.8 1=low to 5=high2010: 2.6 1=low to 5=high2012: 2.9 1=low to 5=high2014: 2.3 1=low to 5=high2016: 2.4 1=low to 5=high2018: 2.1 1=low to 5=high

Source: Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Measured in 1=low to 5=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related in Tunisia is 2.1 1=low to 5=high, measured in 2018. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 14.1% on the previous year and down 25.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related in Tunisia peaked at 2.88 1=low to 5=high in 2012 and was at its lowest, 2.1 1=low to 5=high, in 2018.

That places Tunisia 135th out of 156 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related in Tunisia, year by year

Annual values for Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high) in Tunisia, 2007 to 2018.
Year 1=low to 5=high Change
2007 2.83 1=low to 5=high
2010 2.56 1=low to 5=high -9.5%
2012 2.88 1=low to 5=high +12.5%
2014 2.3 1=low to 5=high -20.2%
2016 2.44 1=low to 5=high +6.3%
2018 2.1 1=low to 5=high -14.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.83 1=low to 5=high 2.83 1=low to 5=high 2.83 1=low to 5=high 1
2010s 2.46 1=low to 5=high 2.1 1=low to 5=high 2.88 1=low to 5=high 5

Countries ranked near Tunisia

  1. 133 Nepal 2.19 1=low to 5=high compare
  2. 134 Ethiopia 2.12 1=low to 5=high compare
  3. 135 Algeria 2.1 1=low to 5=high compare
  4. 135 Angola 2.1 1=low to 5=high compare
  5. 135 Cambodia 2.1 1=low to 5=high compare
  6. 135 Cameroon 2.1 1=low to 5=high compare
  7. 135 Congo 2.1 1=low to 5=high compare

See the full ranking of 203 places →

More private sector data for Tunisia

All data for Tunisia →

Frequently asked questions

What is logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related in Tunisia?
Logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related in Tunisia was 2.1 1=low to 5=high in 2018, according to Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB).
What is the highest logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related recorded in Tunisia?
The highest recorded value was 2.88 1=low to 5=high in 2012.
What is the lowest logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related recorded in Tunisia?
The lowest recorded value was 2.1 1=low to 5=high in 2018.
How does Tunisia rank for logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related?
Tunisia ranks 135th out of 156 countries with data for 2018.
Is logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related rising or falling in Tunisia?
Over the last ten years it is down 25.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Tunisia data come from?
The figures come from Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as part of Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related in Tunisia. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-quality-of-trade-and-transport-related-infrastructure-1-low/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-quality-of-trade-and-transport-related-infrastructure-1-low/tunisia/">Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related in Tunisia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.