Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Cambodia

Cambodia: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score was 71.6% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
71.6%
Change on year
up 0.2%
World rank
81st
of 191 countries
All-time high
71.6%
in 2012
All-time low
68.9%
in 2005
Years of data
16
2004–2019

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Cambodia, 2004–2019

0204060802004201120192004: 69.42005: 68.92006: 69.62007: 70.42008: 70.72009: 712010: 71.22011: 71.52012: 71.62013: 70.72014: 70.82015: 712016: 71.12017: 71.32018: 71.52019: 71.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Cambodia recorded 71.6% for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in 2019.

The figure is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 0.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Cambodia peaked at 71.6% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 68.9%, in 2005.

Cambodia ranks 81st of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Cambodia, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Cambodia, 2004 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2004 69.4%
2005 68.9% -0.7%
2006 69.6% +1.0%
2007 70.4% +1.1%
2008 70.7% +0.5%
2009 71.0% +0.4%
2010 71.2% +0.2%
2011 71.5% +0.4%
2012 71.6% +0.2%
2013 70.7% -1.4%
2014 70.8% +0.2%
2015 71.0% +0.3%
2016 71.1% +0.2%
2017 71.3% +0.3%
2018 71.5% +0.2%
2019 71.6% +0.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 70.0% 68.9% 71.0% 6
2010s 71.2% 70.7% 71.6% 10

Countries ranked near Cambodia

  1. 78 Finland 73.3% compare
  2. 79 Pakistan 72.0% compare
  3. 80 Sweden 71.6% compare
  4. 82 Philippines 71.5% compare
  5. 83 Myanmar 71.5% compare
  6. 84 Italy 70.8% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Cambodia

All data for Cambodia →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Cambodia?
Registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Cambodia was 71.6% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Cambodia?
The highest recorded value was 71.6% in 2012.
What is the lowest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Cambodia?
The lowest recorded value was 68.9% in 2005.
How does Cambodia rank for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
Cambodia ranks 81st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score rising or falling in Cambodia?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Cambodia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Cambodia. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/cambodia/">Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Cambodia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,949 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.