Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in China

China: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score was 69.2% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
69.2%
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
89th
of 191 countries
All-time high
69.2%
in 2019
All-time low
62.2%
in 2004
Years of data
16
2004–2019

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in China, 2004–2019

02040602004201120192004: 62.22005: 62.32006: 662007: 65.72008: 65.62009: 65.72010: 65.72011: 65.12012: 65.82013: 67.32014: 67.32015: 67.32016: 67.42017: 69.22018: 69.22019: 69.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

China recorded 69.2% for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 16 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in China peaked at 69.2% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 62.2%, in 2004.

China ranks 89th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 16 years of available data.

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in China, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in China, 2004 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2004 62.2%
2005 62.3% +0.1%
2006 66.0% +5.9%
2007 65.7% -0.4%
2008 65.6% -0.2%
2009 65.7% +0.1%
2010 65.7% +0.0%
2011 65.1% -0.9%
2012 65.8% +1.1%
2013 67.3% +2.3%
2014 67.3% +0.0%
2015 67.3% +0.0%
2016 67.4% +0.0%
2017 69.2% +2.7%
2018 69.2% +0.0%
2019 69.2% +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 64.6% 62.2% 66.0% 6
2010s 67.4% 65.1% 69.2% 10

Countries ranked near China

  1. 86 Mauritania 70.2% compare
  2. 87 Guyana 69.3% compare
  3. 88 Austria 69.2% compare
  4. 90 Bolivia 69.0% compare
  5. 91 Solomon Islands 68.7% compare
  6. 92 Guinea 68.2% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for China

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in China?
Registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in China was 69.2% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in China?
The highest recorded value was 69.2% in 2019.
What is the lowest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in China?
The lowest recorded value was 62.2% in 2004.
How does China rank for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
China ranks 89th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score rising or falling in China?
Over the last ten years it is up 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this China data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in China. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/china/">Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,949 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.