Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Kiribati

Kiribati: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score was 99.9% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
99.9%
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
3rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
99.9%
in 2019
All-time low
99.7%
in 2005
Years of data
16
2004–2019

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Kiribati, 2004–2019

0204060801002004201120192004: 99.72005: 99.72006: 99.82007: 99.72008: 99.72009: 99.82010: 99.82011: 99.82012: 99.82013: 99.82014: 99.82015: 99.82016: 99.92017: 99.82018: 99.92019: 99.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Kiribati stood at 99.9%. That is the highest value across all 16 years on record.

That represents a change of up 0.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Kiribati peaked at 99.9% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 99.7%, in 2005.

Kiribati ranks 3rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Kiribati, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Kiribati, 2004 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2004 99.7%
2005 99.7% -0.0%
2006 99.8% +0.1%
2007 99.7% -0.0%
2008 99.7% -0.0%
2009 99.8% +0.1%
2010 99.8% -0.0%
2011 99.8% +0.0%
2012 99.8% -0.1%
2013 99.8% -0.0%
2014 99.8% +0.0%
2015 99.8% -0.0%
2016 99.9% +0.1%
2017 99.8% -0.0%
2018 99.9% +0.0%
2019 99.9% +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 99.7% 99.7% 99.8% 6
2010s 99.8% 99.8% 99.9% 10

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 1 Saudi Arabia 100.0% compare
  2. 2 Slovakia 99.9% compare
  3. 4 Georgia 99.8% compare
  4. 5 Kazakhstan 99.8% compare
  5. 6 Belarus 99.7% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Kiribati?
Registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Kiribati was 99.9% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 99.9% in 2019.
What is the lowest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 99.7% in 2005.
How does Kiribati rank for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
Kiribati ranks 3rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score rising or falling in Kiribati?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Kiribati. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/kiribati/">Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Kiribati</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,949 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.