Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Latvia

Latvia: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score was 86.6% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
86.6%
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
39th
of 191 countries
All-time high
86.6%
in 2019
All-time low
86.3%
in 2004
Years of data
16
2004–2019

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Latvia, 2004–2019

0204060802004201120192004: 86.32005: 86.42006: 86.52007: 86.52008: 86.52009: 86.52010: 86.52011: 86.52012: 86.52013: 86.52014: 86.52015: 86.62016: 86.62017: 86.62018: 86.62019: 86.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Latvia is 86.6%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 16 years on record.

That represents a change of up 0.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Latvia peaked at 86.6% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 86.3%, in 2004.

Latvia ranks 39th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Latvia, 2004 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2004 86.3%
2005 86.4% +0.1%
2006 86.5% +0.2%
2007 86.5% -0.1%
2008 86.5% +0.1%
2009 86.5% +0.0%
2010 86.5% -0.0%
2011 86.5% -0.0%
2012 86.5% +0.0%
2013 86.5% +0.0%
2014 86.5% -0.0%
2015 86.6% +0.0%
2016 86.6% +0.0%
2017 86.6% +0.0%
2018 86.6% +0.0%
2019 86.6% +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 86.5% 86.3% 86.5% 6
2010s 86.5% 86.5% 86.6% 10

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 36 Malawi 88.4% compare
  2. 37 Yemen 87.8% compare
  3. 38 Paraguay 87.8% compare
  4. 40 Colombia 86.6% compare
  5. 41 Mongolia 86.2% compare
  6. 42 Ecuador 85.9% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Latvia?
Registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Latvia was 86.6% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 86.6% in 2019.
What is the lowest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 86.3% in 2004.
How does Latvia rank for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
Latvia ranks 39th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Latvia. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/latvia/">Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,949 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.