Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Mauritius
Mauritius: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score was 96.0% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Mauritius, 2004–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Mauritius is 96.0%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 16 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and up 232.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Mauritius peaked at 96.0% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2004.
Mauritius ranks 22nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 0.0% | — |
| 2005 | 0.0% | — |
| 2006 | 0.0% | — |
| 2007 | 28.1% | — |
| 2008 | 28.1% | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 28.9% | +2.9% |
| 2010 | 29.0% | +0.3% |
| 2011 | 29.1% | +0.2% |
| 2012 | 29.2% | +0.3% |
| 2013 | 29.2% | +0.1% |
| 2014 | 29.1% | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 29.1% | +0.2% |
| 2016 | 29.2% | +0.1% |
| 2017 | 95.9% | +228.8% |
| 2018 | 96.0% | +0.1% |
| 2019 | 96.0% | +0.1% |
Mauritius compared with similar countries
- Mauritius's 96.0% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 72.9%, 1.3× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Mauritius's 96.0% is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 51.2%, 1.9× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Mauritius changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | +228.8% | 29.2% | 95.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.2% | 0.0% | 28.9% | 6 |
| 2010s | 49.2% | 29.0% | 96.0% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Mauritius
More private sector data for Mauritius
- Merchandise trade 57.4% (2025)
- Food imports 22.4% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 52.0% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 6.94 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 2.28 billion current US$ (2024)
- Food exports 52.3% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 45.1% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 2.34 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 4.19 billion current US$ (2024)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,883 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Mauritius?
- Registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Mauritius was 96.0% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 96.0% in 2019.
- What is the lowest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2004.
- How does Mauritius rank for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 22nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score rising or falling in Mauritius?
- Over the last ten years it is up 232.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.