Statizoid

Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Japan

Japan: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) was 8 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
8 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 184 countries
All-time high
8 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
8 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Japan, 2015–2019

024682015201720192015: 8 DB16-20 methodology2016: 8 DB16-20 methodology2017: 8 DB16-20 methodology2018: 8 DB16-20 methodology2019: 8 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

Japan recorded 8 DB16-20 methodology for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

That places Japan 1st out of 184 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Countries ranked near Japan

  1. 1 Austria 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 1 Belgium 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 1 Bhutan 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 1 Croatia 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 1 Cyprus 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 1 Czechia 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 1 Denmark 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 1 Djibouti 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 1 Estonia 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 1 Fiji 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 1 Finland 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 1 France 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 1 Germany 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 1 Hong Kong 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 1 Hungary 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 1 Iceland 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 1 Italy 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 1 South Korea 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 1 Kuwait 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 1 Kyrgyzstan 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  21. 1 Lithuania 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  22. 1 Luxembourg 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  23. 1 Malaysia 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  24. 1 Netherlands 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  25. 1 New Zealand 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  26. 1 Qatar 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  27. 1 Rwanda 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  28. 1 San Marino 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  29. 1 Singapore 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  30. 1 Slovakia 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  31. 1 Slovenia 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  32. 1 Saint Lucia 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  33. 1 Sweden 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  34. 1 Switzerland 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  35. 1 Taiwan 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  36. 1 Tonga 8 DB16-20 methodology compare
  37. 1 Turkey 8 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 186 places →

More private sector data for Japan

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Japan?
Registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Japan was 8 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Japan?
The highest recorded value was 8 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Japan?
The lowest recorded value was 8 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Japan rank for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
Japan ranks 1st out of 184 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Japan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 930 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.