Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score in Suriname

Suriname: Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score was 58.33 in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
58.33
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
80th
of 188 countries
All-time high
75
in 2005
All-time low
58.33
in 2009
Years of data
15
2005–2019

Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score in Suriname, 2005–2019

0204060802005201220192005: 752006: 752007: 752008: 752009: 58.32010: 58.32011: 58.32012: 58.32013: 58.32014: 58.32015: 58.32016: 58.32017: 58.32018: 58.32019: 58.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for registering property: procedures (number) - score in Suriname is 58.33, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, registering property: procedures (number) - score in Suriname peaked at 75 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 58.33, in 2009.

Suriname ranks 80th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 71.67 58.33 75 5
2010s 58.33 58.33 58.33 10

Countries ranked near Suriname

  1. 80 Indonesia 58.33 compare
  2. 80 Japan 58.33 compare
  3. 80 Angola 58.33 compare
  4. 80 Cabo Verde 58.33 compare
  5. 80 Chad 58.33 compare
  6. 80 Chile 58.33 compare
  7. 80 Dominican Republic 58.33 compare
  8. 80 El Salvador 58.33 compare
  9. 80 Equatorial Guinea 58.33 compare
  10. 80 Gabon 58.33 compare
  11. 80 Gambia, The 58.33 compare
  12. 80 Germany 58.33 compare
  13. 80 Guinea 58.33 compare
  14. 80 Haiti 58.33 compare
  15. 80 Honduras 58.33 compare
  16. 80 Iran, Islamic Rep. 58.33 compare
  17. 80 Israel 58.33 compare
  18. 80 Jordan 58.33 compare
  19. 80 Lao PDR 58.33 compare
  20. 80 Madagascar 58.33 compare
  21. 80 Malawi 58.33 compare
  22. 80 Malaysia 58.33 compare
  23. 80 Maldives 58.33 compare
  24. 80 Montenegro 58.33 compare
  25. 80 Morocco 58.33 compare
  26. 80 Myanmar 58.33 compare
  27. 80 Paraguay 58.33 compare
  28. 80 Peru 58.33 compare
  29. 80 Poland 58.33 compare
  30. 80 Romania 58.33 compare
  31. 80 Serbia 58.33 compare
  32. 80 Singapore 58.33 compare
  33. 80 Spain 58.33 compare
  34. 80 St. Kitts and Nevis 58.33 compare
  35. 80 Sudan 58.33 compare
  36. 80 Turkiye 58.33 compare
  37. 80 United Kingdom 58.33 compare
  38. 80 Yemen, Rep. 58.33 compare
  39. 80 Zambia 58.33 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More private sector data for Suriname

All data for Suriname →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: procedures (number) - score in Suriname?
Registering property: procedures (number) - score in Suriname was 58.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: procedures (number) - score recorded in Suriname?
The highest recorded value was 75 in 2005.
What is the lowest registering property: procedures (number) - score recorded in Suriname?
The lowest recorded value was 58.33 in 2009.
How does Suriname rank for registering property: procedures (number) - score?
Suriname ranks 80th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is registering property: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Suriname?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Suriname data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,938 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.