Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Australia

Australia: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 19.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
19.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
58th
of 187 countries
All-time high
20 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
19.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2018
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Australia, 2015–2019

051015202015201720192015: 20 DB17-20 methodology2016: 20 DB17-20 methodology2017: 20 DB17-20 methodology2018: 19.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 19.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

Australia recorded 19.5 DB17-20 methodology for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is down 2.5% over five years.

Australia ranks 58th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Australia, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Australia, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 20 DB17-20 methodology
2016 20 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 20 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 19.5 DB17-20 methodology -2.5%
2019 19.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Australia

  1. 56 Norway 20 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 56 Portugal 20 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 58 Bahrain 19.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 58 Bulgaria 19.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 58 Fiji 19.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Australia

All data for Australia →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Australia?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Australia was 19.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Australia?
The highest recorded value was 20 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Australia?
The lowest recorded value was 19.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2018.
How does Australia rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Australia ranks 58th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Australia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Australia. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/australia/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Australia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.