Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Belarus

Belarus: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 23.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
23.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
29th
of 187 countries
All-time high
23.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2016
All-time low
21.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Belarus, 2015–2019

05101520252015201720192015: 21.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 23.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 23.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 23.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 23.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Belarus is 23.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of up 9.3% over five years.

Belarus ranks 29th of 187 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Belarus, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 21.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 23.5 DB17-20 methodology +9.3%
2017 23.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 23.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 23.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 26 France 24 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 26 Kyrgyzstan 24 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 28 China 23.95 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 29 Croatia 23.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 29 Ireland 23.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 29 Switzerland 23.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Belarus?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Belarus was 23.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 23.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2016.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 21.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Belarus rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Belarus ranks 29th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Belarus. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/belarus/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.