Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Canada

Canada: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 21.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
21.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
49th
of 187 countries
All-time high
21.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
21.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Canada, 2015–2019

051015202015201720192015: 21.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 21.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 21.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 21.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 21.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Canada is 21.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

Canada ranks 49th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Canada, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Canada, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 21.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 21.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 21.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 21.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 21.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Canada

  1. 47 Belgium 22 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 47 Republic of Moldova 22 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 49 Georgia 21.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 51 Seychelles 21 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 51 United Arab Emirates 21 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Canada

All data for Canada →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Canada?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Canada was 21.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Canada?
The highest recorded value was 21.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Canada?
The lowest recorded value was 21.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Canada rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Canada ranks 49th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Canada data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Canada. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/canada/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Canada</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.