Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Palau

Palau: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 12 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
12 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
110th
of 187 countries
All-time high
12 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
12 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Palau, 2015–2019

02.557.51012.52015201720192015: 12 DB17-20 methodology2016: 12 DB17-20 methodology2017: 12 DB17-20 methodology2018: 12 DB17-20 methodology2019: 12 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Palau is 12 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Palau ranks 110th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Palau, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Palau, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 12 DB17-20 methodology
2016 12 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 12 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 12 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 12 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Palau

  1. 110 Cape Verde 12 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 110 Paraguay 12 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 113 Belize 11 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 113 Panama 11 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 113 Solomon Islands 11 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 113 Trinidad and Tobago 11 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Palau

All data for Palau →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Palau?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Palau was 12 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Palau?
The highest recorded value was 12 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Palau?
The lowest recorded value was 12 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Palau rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Palau ranks 110th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Palau data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Palau. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/palau/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Palau</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.