Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
99th
of 187 countries
All-time high
14 DB17-20 methodology
in 2016
All-time low
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Puerto Rico, 2015–2019

0510152015201720192015: 8.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 14 DB17-20 methodology2017: 13.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 13.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 13.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Puerto Rico stood at 13.5 DB17-20 methodology.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 58.8% over five years.

Puerto Rico ranks 99th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Puerto Rico, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Puerto Rico, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 8.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 14 DB17-20 methodology +64.7%
2017 13.5 DB17-20 methodology -3.6%
2018 13.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 13.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Puerto Rico

  1. 99 Argentina 13.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 99 Guatemala 13.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 99 Suriname 13.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 99 Tunisia 13.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 99 Palestine, State of 13.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Puerto Rico

All data for Puerto Rico →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Puerto Rico?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Puerto Rico was 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Puerto Rico?
The highest recorded value was 14 DB17-20 methodology in 2016.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Puerto Rico?
The lowest recorded value was 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Puerto Rico rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Puerto Rico ranks 99th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Puerto Rico data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Puerto Rico. Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/puerto-rico-us/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Puerto Rico</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.