Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) in Chile
Chile: Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) was 3.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) in Chile, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) in Chile stood at 3.5 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
That places Chile 60th out of 186 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) in Chile, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3.5 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 3.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 58 China (People’s Republic of) 3.95 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 59 Mexico 3.92 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Bangladesh 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Bahrain 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Benin 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Colombia 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Costa Rica 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Croatia 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Hungary 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Jordan 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Kazakhstan 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Luxembourg 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Malta 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Namibia 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Norway 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Qatar 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Slovenia 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Uganda 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Ukraine 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Uruguay 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 60 Zimbabwe 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Chile
- Merchandise trade 55.9% (2025)
- Food imports 11.6% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 70.1% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 92.66 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 22.7% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 11.7% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 107.00 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 5,388 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2994 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 7.91 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) in Chile?
- Registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) in Chile was 3.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Chile rank for registering property: transparency of information index (0-6)?
- Chile ranks 60th out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The transparency of information index evaluates whether the land administration system makes land-related information publicly available. It has ten components: (i) whether information on land ownership is made publicly available; (ii) whether the list of documents required for completing the registration of property transactions is made publicly available; (iii) whether the fee schedule for completing the registration of property transactions is made publicly available; (iv) whether the agency in charge of immovable property registration commits to a specific time frame for delivering a legally binding document that proves property ownership; (v) whether there is a specific and independent mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the agency in charge of immovable property registration; (vi) whether there are publicly available official statistics tracking the number of transactions at the immovable property registration agency; (vii) whether maps of land plots are made publicly available; (viii) whether the fee schedule for accessing maps is made publicly available; and (ix) whether the mapping agency commits to a specific time frame for delivering an updated map; and (x) whether there is a specific and independent mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the mapping agency. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.