Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) in Denmark
Denmark: Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) in Denmark, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Denmark recorded 3 DB16-20 methodology for registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
That places Denmark 82nd out of 186 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) in Denmark, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Denmark
- 80 India 3.44 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 81 United States of America 3.2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Indonesia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Australia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Austria 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Azerbaijan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Belgium 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Canada 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Dominican Republic 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Egypt 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Finland 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 France 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Ghana 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Guyana 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Kenya 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Lebanon 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Lesotho 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Montenegro 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Panama 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Philippines 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Puerto Rico 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Spain 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Uzbekistan 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 82 Viet Nam 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Denmark
- Merchandise trade 61.5% (2025)
- Food imports 13.6% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 75.9% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 136.23 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 17.1% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 73.9% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 148.38 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 24,692 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.3208 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 11.28 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) in Denmark?
- Registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) in Denmark was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) recorded in Denmark?
- The highest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) recorded in Denmark?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Denmark rank for registering property: transparency of information index (0-6)?
- Denmark ranks 82nd out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Denmark data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The transparency of information index evaluates whether the land administration system makes land-related information publicly available. It has ten components: (i) whether information on land ownership is made publicly available; (ii) whether the list of documents required for completing the registration of property transactions is made publicly available; (iii) whether the fee schedule for completing the registration of property transactions is made publicly available; (iv) whether the agency in charge of immovable property registration commits to a specific time frame for delivering a legally binding document that proves property ownership; (v) whether there is a specific and independent mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the agency in charge of immovable property registration; (vi) whether there are publicly available official statistics tracking the number of transactions at the immovable property registration agency; (vii) whether maps of land plots are made publicly available; (viii) whether the fee schedule for accessing maps is made publicly available; and (ix) whether the mapping agency commits to a specific time frame for delivering an updated map; and (x) whether there is a specific and independent mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the mapping agency. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.