Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) in Poland
Poland: Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) was 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▼ Falling
Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) in Poland, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) in Poland stood at 2.5 DB16-20 methodology. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.7% over five years.
Poland ranks 105th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) in Poland, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 2.5 DB16-20 methodology | -16.7% |
| 2017 | 2.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 2.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 3.5 DB16-20 methodology, 71% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Poland's 2.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 4 DB16-20 methodology, 62% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Poland
- 105 Albania 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Argentina 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Bahamas 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Belize 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Botswana 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Cameroon 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Cyprus 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Honduras 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Kuwait 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Mongolia 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Morocco 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Nepal 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Oman 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Papua New Guinea 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Saudi Arabia 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Switzerland 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Syria 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Tanzania 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 United Arab Emirates 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 105 Yemen 2.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Poland
- Merchandise trade 80.6% (2025)
- Food imports 9.9% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 77.0% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 420.91 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 86.33 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 15.6% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 77.8% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 413.89 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 130.41 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 11,360 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) in Poland?
- Registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) in Poland was 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: transparency of information index (0-6) recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2016.
- How does Poland rank for registering property: transparency of information index (0-6)?
- Poland ranks 105th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Transparency of information index (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The transparency of information index evaluates whether the land administration system makes land-related information publicly available. It has ten components: (i) whether information on land ownership is made publicly available; (ii) whether the list of documents required for completing the registration of property transactions is made publicly available; (iii) whether the fee schedule for completing the registration of property transactions is made publicly available; (iv) whether the agency in charge of immovable property registration commits to a specific time frame for delivering a legally binding document that proves property ownership; (v) whether there is a specific and independent mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the agency in charge of immovable property registration; (vi) whether there are publicly available official statistics tracking the number of transactions at the immovable property registration agency; (vii) whether maps of land plots are made publicly available; (viii) whether the fee schedule for accessing maps is made publicly available; and (ix) whether the mapping agency commits to a specific time frame for delivering an updated map; and (x) whether there is a specific and independent mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the mapping agency. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.