Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score in Georgia
Georgia: Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score was 99.0% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score in Georgia, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Georgia recorded 99.0% for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 0.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score in Georgia peaked at 99.0% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 88.6%, in 2003.
That places Georgia 50th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score in Georgia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 88.6% | — |
| 2004 | 93.1% | +5.1% |
| 2005 | 93.2% | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 94.5% | +1.5% |
| 2007 | 95.2% | +0.7% |
| 2008 | 98.0% | +2.9% |
| 2009 | 98.2% | +0.2% |
| 2010 | 97.5% | -0.7% |
| 2011 | 97.7% | +0.2% |
| 2012 | 98.0% | +0.3% |
| 2013 | 98.1% | +0.2% |
| 2014 | 98.2% | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 98.3% | +0.2% |
| 2016 | 98.7% | +0.4% |
| 2017 | 98.7% | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 98.9% | +0.1% |
| 2019 | 99.0% | +0.1% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 99.0% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 95.5%, 1.0× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 99.0% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 99.2%, 100% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.4% | 88.6% | 98.2% | 7 |
| 2010s | 98.3% | 97.5% | 99.0% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 47 Chinese Taipei 99.1% compare
- 48 Portugal 99.1% compare
- 49 Iceland 99.0% compare
- 51 Uzbekistan 98.9% compare
- 52 Palau 98.9% compare
- 53 Switzerland 98.9% compare
More private sector data for Georgia
- Merchandise trade 67.7% (2025)
- Food imports 12.5% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 72.4% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 18.53 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 45.9% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 33.7% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 7.29 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,852 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1911 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 11.16 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score in Georgia?
- Starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score in Georgia was 99.0% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 99.0% in 2019.
- What is the lowest starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 88.6% in 2003.
- How does Georgia rank for starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score?
- Georgia ranks 50th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is starting a business: cost - men (% of income per capita) - score rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.