Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score in Kiribati

Kiribati: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score was 64.71 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
64.71
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
96th
of 188 countries
All-time high
70.59
in 2003
All-time low
64.71
in 2004
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score in Kiribati, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 70.62004: 64.72005: 64.72006: 64.72007: 64.72008: 64.72009: 64.72010: 64.72011: 64.72012: 64.72013: 64.72014: 64.72015: 64.72016: 64.72017: 64.72018: 64.72019: 64.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score in Kiribati is 64.71, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score in Kiribati peaked at 70.59 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 64.71, in 2004.

That places Kiribati 96th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 65.55 64.71 70.59 7
2010s 64.71 64.71 64.71 10

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 96 Nigeria 64.71 compare
  2. 96 Bahamas 64.71 compare
  3. 96 Barbados 64.71 compare
  4. 96 Bulgaria 64.71 compare
  5. 96 Colombia 64.71 compare
  6. 96 Croatia 64.71 compare
  7. 96 Dominican Republic 64.71 compare
  8. 96 Gabon 64.71 compare
  9. 96 Guyana 64.71 compare
  10. 96 Italy 64.71 compare
  11. 96 Jordan 64.71 compare
  12. 96 Kenya 64.71 compare
  13. 96 Malawi 64.71 compare
  14. 96 Micronesia (country) 64.71 compare
  15. 96 Nicaragua 64.71 compare
  16. 96 Paraguay 64.71 compare
  17. 96 San Marino 64.71 compare
  18. 96 Serbia 64.71 compare
  19. 96 Slovakia 64.71 compare
  20. 96 Solomon Islands 64.71 compare
  21. 96 South Africa 64.71 compare
  22. 96 Spain 64.71 compare
  23. 96 Sri Lanka 64.71 compare
  24. 96 Saint Kitts and Nevis 64.71 compare
  25. 96 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 64.71 compare
  26. 96 Syria 64.71 compare
  27. 96 Trinidad and Tobago 64.71 compare
  28. 96 Turkey 64.71 compare
  29. 96 Vanuatu 64.71 compare
  30. 96 Zambia 64.71 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More private sector data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score in Kiribati?
Starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score in Kiribati was 64.71 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 70.59 in 2003.
What is the lowest starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 64.71 in 2004.
How does Kiribati rank for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Kiribati ranks 96th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score rising or falling in Kiribati?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.