Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score in Costa Rica

Costa Rica: Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score was 77.39 in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
77.39
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
149th
of 191 countries
All-time high
77.89
in 2016
All-time low
10.05
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score in Costa Rica, 2003–2019

204060802003201120192003: 10.12004: 10.12005: 10.12006: 13.12007: 10.12008: 26.12009: 26.62010: 26.62011: 26.62012: 42.72013: 77.42014: 77.42015: 77.42016: 77.92017: 77.92018: 77.42019: 77.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Costa Rica recorded 77.39 for starting a business: time - women (days)- score in 2019.

The figure is up 190.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, starting a business: time - women (days)- score in Costa Rica peaked at 77.89 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 10.05, in 2003.

That places Costa Rica 149th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score in Costa Rica, year by year

Annual values for Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score in Costa Rica, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 10.05
2004 10.05 +0.0%
2005 10.05 +0.0%
2006 13.07 +30.0%
2007 10.05 -23.1%
2008 26.13 +160.0%
2009 26.63 +1.9%
2010 26.63 +0.0%
2011 26.63 +0.0%
2012 42.71 +60.4%
2013 77.39 +81.2%
2014 77.39 +0.0%
2015 77.39 +0.0%
2016 77.89 +0.6%
2017 77.89 +0.0%
2018 77.39 -0.6%
2019 77.39 +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 15.15 10.05 26.63 7
2010s 63.87 26.63 77.89 10

Countries ranked near Costa Rica

  1. 147 Central African Republic 78.39 compare
  2. 148 Nepal 77.89 compare
  3. 149 Bulgaria 77.39 compare
  4. 149 Kenya 77.39 compare
  5. 152 Uganda 76.38 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Costa Rica

All data for Costa Rica →

Frequently asked questions

What is starting a business: time - women (days)- score in Costa Rica?
Starting a business: time - women (days)- score in Costa Rica was 77.39 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest starting a business: time - women (days)- score recorded in Costa Rica?
The highest recorded value was 77.89 in 2016.
What is the lowest starting a business: time - women (days)- score recorded in Costa Rica?
The lowest recorded value was 10.05 in 2003.
How does Costa Rica rank for starting a business: time - women (days)- score?
Costa Rica ranks 149th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is starting a business: time - women (days)- score rising or falling in Costa Rica?
Over the last ten years it is up 190.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score in Costa Rica. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/starting-a-business-time-women-days-score/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/starting-a-business-time-women-days-score/costa-rica/">Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score in Costa Rica</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.