Congo vs Germany: Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-1

Congo
9.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Germany
9.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Congo rank
120th
Germany rank
120th

Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-1 over time

  • Congo
  • Germany
0246810201420162019

How they compare

Congo currently reports 9.5 DB16-20 methodology against 9.5 DB16-20 methodology in Germany, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 120th and Germany ranks 120th of 183 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: building quality control index (0-1, Congo or Germany?
Congo, at 9.5 DB16-20 methodology against 9.5 DB16-20 methodology in Germany as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: building quality control index (0-1 between Congo and Germany?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Germany?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Congo and Germany rank globally for dealing with construction permits: building quality control index (0-1?
Congo ranks 120th and Germany ranks 120th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Building quality control index (0-15) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 1,109 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The building quality control index is the sum of the following six indices: quality of building regulations, quality control before construction, quality control during construction, quality control after construction, liability and insurance regimes and professional certifications. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.