Kazakhstan vs Marshall Islands: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Kazakhstan
89.6%
in 2019
Marshall Islands
89.2%
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
84th
Marshall Islands rank
87th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 89.6% against 89.2% in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 84th and Marshall Islands ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Marshall Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.4% | 95.4% | 19.9% | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 90.1% | 90.0% | 0.1% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Kazakhstan or Marshall Islands?
- Kazakhstan, at 89.6% against 89.2% in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Kazakhstan and Marshall Islands?
- 0.4%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Marshall Islands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Marshall Islands rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 84th and Marshall Islands ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.