Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score in Marshall Islands
Marshall Islands: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score was 89.2% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score in Marshall Islands, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in Marshall Islands is 89.2%, measured in 2019.
The figure is down 0.6% on the previous year and down 5.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in Marshall Islands peaked at 99.1% in 2008 and was at its lowest, 86.9%, in 2012.
That places Marshall Islands 87th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score in Marshall Islands, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 94.1% | — |
| 2006 | 94.4% | +0.3% |
| 2007 | 94.5% | +0.2% |
| 2008 | 99.1% | +4.9% |
| 2009 | 94.6% | -4.6% |
| 2010 | 97.7% | +3.3% |
| 2011 | 97.2% | -0.5% |
| 2012 | 86.9% | -10.6% |
| 2013 | 87.9% | +1.2% |
| 2014 | 87.6% | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 87.7% | +0.1% |
| 2016 | 87.9% | +0.3% |
| 2017 | 88.5% | +0.7% |
| 2018 | 89.7% | +1.3% |
| 2019 | 89.2% | -0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.4% | 94.1% | 99.1% | 5 |
| 2010s | 90.0% | 86.9% | 97.7% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Marshall Islands
- 84 Kazakhstan 89.6% compare
- 85 United Arab Emirates 89.2% compare
- 86 New Zealand 89.2% compare
- 88 Sao Tome and Principe 89.0% compare
- 89 Malta 88.7% compare
- 90 Zambia 88.4% compare
More private sector data for Marshall Islands
- Merchandise trade 59.4% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 111.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports 72.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,984 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2338 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 7.46 % change on previous year (2025)
- Merchandise imports (current US$), per capita 3,059 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise imports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.3604 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise imports (current US$), annual growth rate 11 % change on previous year (2025)
- Commercial service exports (current US$), per capita 516.22 current US$ per person (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in Marshall Islands?
- Dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score in Marshall Islands was 89.2% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 99.1% in 2008.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 86.9% in 2012.
- How does Marshall Islands rank for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 87th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score rising or falling in Marshall Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Marshall Islands data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.