Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Tanzania: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
74.0%
in 2019
Tanzania
73.2%
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
133rd
Tanzania rank
135th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Tanzania
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 74.0% against 73.2% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Tanzania ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 133rd and Tanzania ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 38.6% | 38.6% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 47.0% | 56.3% | 9.3% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Tanzania?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 74.0% against 73.2% in Tanzania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Tanzania?
- 0.8%, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Tanzania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Tanzania rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 133rd and Tanzania ranks 135th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.