Kuwait vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score
Kuwait
72.6%
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
73.2%
in 2019
Kuwait rank
136th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
135th
Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score over time
- Kuwait
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 73.2% against 72.6% in Kuwait, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 136th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.4% | 19.3% | 40.1% | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 71.6% | 56.3% | 15.3% | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score, Kuwait or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 73.2% against 72.6% in Kuwait as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score between Kuwait and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.6%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Kuwait and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for dealing with construction permits: cost (% of warehouse value) - score?
- Kuwait ranks 136th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 135th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Cost (% of Warehouse value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.